The hottest robot also has the copyright to write

Robot writing also has copyright. Nanshan District People's Court concluded the country's first case of infringement of artificial intelligence works

Artificial Intelligence reading:

Tencent robot's financial articles were copied by "Loan Home" without permission. Whether they constitute copyright infringement has aroused widespread concern in society. Recently, Shenzhen Nanshan District People's Court concluded the country's first case that an article generated by artificial intelligence constitutes a work

original title:

robot manuscript also has copyright

Nanshan District People's Court concluded the first infringement of artificial intelligence works in China and maintained an average annual growth of 20%; By 2035 case

Shenzhen Evening News March 15, 2020, the financial articles written by Tencent robot were copied by "Loan Home" without permission. Whether it constituted copyright infringement has aroused widespread concern in the society. Recently, Shenzhen Nanshan District People's Court concluded the country's first case that an article generated by artificial intelligence constitutes a work

on August 20, 2018, Tencent securities station published for the first time a financial report article entitled "afternoon review: the Shanghai stock index rose slightly by 0.11% to 2671.93 points, led by sectors such as communication operations and oil exploration", which ended with a note that "this article is automatically written by Tencent robot dreamwriter". On the same day, Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co., Ltd. also published a financial report article at its "Loan Home" station, with the title and content completely consistent with the article involved. For this reason, Shenzhen Tencent computer system Co., Ltd. sued Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co., Ltd. in court, claiming that the defendant's behavior violated the plaintiff's right to information dissemination and constituted unfair competition

after the trial, the Nanshan District People's court held that the key to whether the article constitutes a written work is whether it is original. The article involved in the case is a work of overall intellectual creation formed by the division of labor of multiple teams and individuals presided over by Tencent, which reflects the successful transformation of the plaintiff's Yulian group. For the demand of publishing stock evaluation summary articles, attention must be paid to making the sample plumb, and in the middle position and intention. It is a legal person's work presided over by the plaintiff. Without permission, the defendant went to Nanyue Hengshan again at the "Loan Home" station operated by him Zhangjiajie National Forest Park (pay another fee to provide the content of the sued infringement article for the public to obtain at the selected time and place, which infringed the plaintiff's right to information network communication, and should bear the corresponding civil liability. Because the defendant has deleted the infringing works, the defendant is judged to compensate the plaintiff for the economic losses and reasonable rights maintenance costs of 1500 yuan. At present, the first instance judgment of the case has taken effect.

(yixiaohong)

[see Shenzhen client, Shenzhen: zhengxiaopeng]